Proposta metodológica para a escrita acadêmica assistida por inteligência artificial: o marco CO–STAR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46219/rechiem.v17i3.206Palavras-chave:
Inteligência artificial, Inovações nos métodos de ensino, Ética da ciência, Litmaps, ConsensusResumo
Este artigo apresenta uma proposta metodológica para apoiar a escrita de ensaios acadêmicos por meio do uso pedagógico de ferramentas de inteligência artificial (IA), especificamente o ChatGPT integrado ao marco CO–STAR (Contexto, Objetivo, Estilo, Tom, Audiência e Resposta) para o design de prompts. A pesquisa corresponde a um estudo exploratório baseado na implementação formativa dessa proposta, documentado por meio de um estudo de caso instrumental com dois estudantes de um doutorado em Didática da Matemática. O processo foi desenvolvido em quatro fases: (1) diagnóstico das habilidades de escrita, (2) design de prompts com o CO–STAR, (3) aplicação em sessões síncronas e (4) avaliação por meio de apresentações orais. Os resultados evidenciam melhorias na organização das ideias, no registro acadêmico, na clareza textual e na apropriação crítica do uso da IA. Além disso, foram identificadas aprendizagens relacionadas à integridade acadêmica, à revisão de fontes e ao posicionamento do autor no texto. Conclui-se que essa proposta favorece uma escrita reflexiva e ética, promovendo uma relação crítica com tecnologias emergentes. Ademais, demonstra potencial de transferência para outros contextos formativos e abre novas linhas de investigação sobre escrita acadêmica, IA e formação investigativa em educação matemática.
Downloads
Referências
Ahmed, I., Liu, W., Roscoe, R. D., Reilley, E. y McNamara, D. S. (2025). Multifaceted assessment of responsible use and bias in language models for education. Computers, 14(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers14030100
Beel, J., Gipp, B., Langer, S. y Breitinger, C. (2016). Research–paper recommender systems: A literature survey. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 17(4), 305–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799–015–0156–0
Bekker, M. (2024). Large language models and academic writing: Five tiers of engagement. South African Journal of Science, 120(1/2), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2024/17147
Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan–Major, A. y Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (pp. 610–623). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922
Bista, K. y Bista, R. (2025). Leveraging AI tools in academic writing: Insights from doctoral students on benefits and challenges. American Journal of STEM Education: Issues and Perspectives, 6, 32–47. https://doi.org/10.32674/9m8dq081
Bouzar, A., El Idrissi, K. y Ghourdou, T. (2024). ChatGPT and academic writing self–efficacy: Unveiling correlations and technological dependency among postgraduate students. Arab World English Journal, 15, 225–236. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/chatgpt.15
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Butson, R. y Spronken–Smith, R. (2024). AI and its implications for research in higher education: A critical dialogue. Higher Education Research & Development, 43(3), 563–577. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2023.2280200
Calle–Arango, L. y Ávila Reyes, N. (2023). Obstacles, facilitators, and needs in doctoral writing: A systematic review. Studies in Continuing Education, 45(2), 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2022.2026315
Castañeda, A. y Sánchez, M. (2025). ¿Se vale usar ChatGPT si igual entendí el tema? Una conversación urgente sobre IA en el aula. Revista Enseñanza de las Matemáticas y Experiencias Docentes, 1(2), 9–14. https://doi.org/10.24844/REMED/0102.00
Chen, Y.C. (2019). Writing as an epistemological tool: Perspectives from personal, disciplinary, and sociocultural landscapes. En V. Prain y B. Hand (Eds.), Theorizing the future of science education research (pp. 115–132). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978–3–030–24013–4_8
Cordón, Ó. (2023). Inteligencia artificial en educación superior: Oportunidades y riesgos. Revista Interuniversitaria de Investigación en Tecnología Educativa, 15, 16–27. https://doi.org/10.6018/riite.591581
Cox, A. (2024). Algorithmic literacy, AI literacy and responsible generative AI literacy. Journal of Web Librarianship, 18(3), 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2024.2395341
Delgadillo, I. y Beel, J. (2019). Towards reproducible research in recommender systems for research papers. Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, 498–502. https://doi.org/10.1145/3298689.3347043
Dempere, J., Modugu, K. y Ramasamy, L. (2023). The impact of ChatGPT on higher education. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1206936
Flick, U. (2018). An introduction to qualitative research (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Fuchs, K. (2023). Exploring the opportunities and challenges of NLP models in higher education: ¿Is ChatGPT a blessing or a curse? Frontiers in Education, 8, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1166682
Hutson, J. (2024). Rethinking plagiarism in the era of generative AI. Journal of Intelligent Communication, 3(2), 20–31. https://doi.org/10.54963/jic.v3i2.220
Jain, S., Kumar, A., Roy, T., Shinde, K., Vignesh, G. y Tendulkar, R. (2024). SciSpace literature review: Harnessing AI for effortless scientific discovery. En N. Goharian, N. Tonellotto, Y. He, A. Lipani, G. McDonald, C. Macdonald y I. Ounis (Eds.), Advances in Information Retrieval (pp. 256–260). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978–3–031–56069–9_28
Ji, Z., Lee, N., Frieske, R., Yu, T., Su, D., Xu, Y., Ishii, E., Bang, Y. J., Madotto, A. y Fung, P. (2023). Survey of hallucination in natural language generation. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(12), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1145/3571730
Karakose, T. (2023). The utility of ChatGPT in educational research—Potential opportunities and pitfalls. Educational Process: International Journal, 12(2), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2023.122.1
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeiffer, J., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Sedlmeier, P., Spinner, B., … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, Article 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Lee, S. S. y Moore, R. L. (2024). Harnessing generative AI for automated feedback in higher education: A systematic review. Online Learning, 28(3), 82–105. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1446868.pdf
Maynez, J., Narayan, S., Bohnet, B. y McDonald, R. (2020). On faithfulness and factuality in abstractive summarization. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 1906–1919). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.acl–main.173
Mugaanyi, J., Sekajja, S. y Ndagire, S. (2024). Evaluation of large language model performance and reliability for citations and references in scholarly writing: Cross–disciplinary study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 26, e52935. https://doi.org/10.2196/52935
Nava-Guzmán, C. (2025). La inteligencia artificial generativa en la enseñanza de las matemáticas. Revista Enseñanza de las Matemáticas y Experiencias Docentes, 1(2), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.24844/REMED/0102.05
Nguyen, A., Hong, Y., Dang, B. y Huang, X. (2024). Human–AI collaboration patterns in AI–assisted academic writing. Studies in Higher Education, 49(5), 847–864. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2323593
Nguyen, T. Y. P., Nguyen, N. T. y Phan, N. K. H. (2025). The challenges of applying ChatGPT in the academic writing of postgraduate students in English major at IUH. International Journal of AI in Language Education, 2(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijaile.25212
Oates, A. y Johnson, D. (2025). ChatGPT in the classroom: Evaluating its role in fostering critical–evaluation skills. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 35(1), 45–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593–024–00452–8
OpenAI (2024). ChatGPT (Aug 3 version) [Modelo de lenguaje]. https://chat.openai.com/
Pavlova, N. H. (2024). Flipped dialogic learning method with ChatGPT: A case study. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 19(1), Article em0764. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/14025
Rababah, L. M., Rababah, M. A. y Al–Khawaldeh, N. N. (2024). Graduate students’ ChatGPT experience and perspectives during thesis writing. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP), 14(3), 22–35. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v14i3.48395
Ramírez, B., Morales–Reyes, J. L. y Parraguez, M. (2025). Pauta para la declaración del uso ético y responsable de la inteligencia artificial en investigaciones realizadas por estudiantes universitarios. Manuscrito sometido para publicación.
Román–Acosta, D., Rodríguez Torres, E., Baquedano, M. B., López, L. C. y Pérez, A. (2024). ChatGPT and its use to improve academic writing in postgraduate students. Praxis Pedagógica, 24(36), 53–75. https://doi.org/10.26620/uniminuto.praxis.24.36.2024.53–75
Sánchez, E., Sánchez, M., García, M., Aguayo, L., Valenzuela, C. y Chávez, Y. (2025). Ensayos y revisiones de literatura en Educación Matemática: Caracterización y criterios de evaluación. Educación Matemática, 37(1), 5–8. https://doi.org/10.24844/EM3701.00
Stake, R. E. (2020). Investigación con estudio de casos (6ª ed.). Ediciones Morata.
Suárez–Pizzarello, M., Sánchez–Trujillo, M. D. L. A. y Rodríguez Flores, E. A. (2024). Exploring ChatGPT–4 as an academic assistant in thesis development: A case study on postgraduate higher education. Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE 4th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies on Education & Research (ICALTER) (pp. 1–4). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALTER65499.2024.10819226
Sulisworo, D. (2023). Exploring research idea growth with Litmap: Visualizing literature review graphically. Bincang Sains Dan Teknologi, 2(2), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.56741/bst.v2i02.323
Susnjak, T. y McIntosh, T. R. (2024). ChatGPT: The end of online exam integrity? Education Sciences, 14(6), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14060656
Tran, T. T. P., Dang, T. N. y Nguyen, V. L. P. (2025). Master students’ perceptions of how ChatGPT influenced critical thinking in academic writing at the Industrial University of Ho Chi Minh City. International Journal of AI in Language Education, 2(2), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijaile.25222
Vivas.AI. (2024). Mastering prompt engineering: A guide to the CO–STAR and TIDD–EC frameworks. Medium. https://vivasai01.medium.com/mastering-prompt-engineering-a-guide-to-the-co-star-and-tidd-ec-frameworks-3334588cb908
Wahba, F., Ajlouni, A. O. y Abumosa, M. A. (2024). The impact of ChatGPT-based learning statistics on undergraduates’ statistical reasoning and attitudes toward statistics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(7), Article em2468. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14726
Wang, J., Liardét, C. y Lum, J. (2025). Feeling like an academic writer: An exploration of doctoral students’ struggle for recognition. Studies in Continuing Education, 47(1), 285–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2024.2358006
Zapata–Ros, M. (2018). La universidad inteligente: La transición de los LMS a los sistemas inteligentes de aprendizaje en educación superior. Revista de Educación a Distancia, 57(10), 1–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/red/57/10
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2025 José L. Morales-Reyes, Brahiam Ramírez, Marcela Parraguez-González
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
